NCDR Study in JAMA: Only Half of Nonacute PCIs Deemed Appropriate

Nearly half of all PCIs performed for nonacute cases may be inappropriate, according to a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry published in JAMA. Paul Chan and colleagues analyzed data from more than half a million PCI procedures performed between July 1, 2009 and September 30, 2010.

Out of 500,154 PCIs they found that:

–355,417 (71.1%) were for acute indications.

  • STEMI: 103,245 (20.6%)
  • NON-STEMI: 105,708 (21.1%)
  • High-risk unstable angina: 146,464 (29.3%)

–144,737 (28.9%) were for nonacute indications.

The vast majority (98.6%) of the PCIs for acute indications were classified as appropriate. By contrast, only half (50.4%) of the PCIs for nonacute indications were classified as appropriate. 38% were classified as uncertain while 11.6% were classified as inappropriate.

Among the nonacute cases deemed inappropriate

  • 53.8% were for patients with no angina,
  • 71.6% were for patients who had low-risk ischemia on noninvasive stress testing, and
  • 95.8% were for patients taking less than 2 angina medications.

For the acute cases, there was little variation in the rate of inappropriate procedures between hospitals. For the nonacute cases, however, substantial variation between hospitals was observed: the rate of inappropriate procedures for nonacute cases ranged from 6% or lower in the lowest quartile compared to 16% or greater in the highest quartile. The authors wrote that the high rate in this group “suggests overuse of PCI in these hospitals and an important opportunity for improvement in patient

The authors acknowledge that some of the procedures classified as inappropriate “may be explained by extenuating circumstances” but said these were unlikely to explain the majority of procedures. Although patient preference may explain some inappropriate procedures, the authors point out that many patients overestimate the benefits of PCI and that most PCIs are performed immediately following diagnostic angiography, allowing little opportunity for a serious discussion with the patient.

The authors concluded that “better understanding of the clinical settings in which inappropriate PCIs occur and reduction in their variation across hospitals should be targets for quality improvement.”

Here is the JAMA press release:

Most Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (Such As Balloon Angioplasty) Performed in U.S. For Acute Indications Appear to be Warranted

CHICAGO – In an examination of the appropriateness of the widespread use of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), researchers found that of more than 500,000 PCIs included in the study, nearly all for acute indications were classified as appropriate, whereas only about half of PCIs performed for nonacute indications could be classified as appropriate, according to a study in the July 6 issue of JAMA.

“Approximated 600,000 percutaneous coronary interventions [procedures such as balloon angioplasty or stent placement used to open narrowed coronary arteries] are performed in the United States each year, at a cost that exceeds $12 billion. Patients who undergo PCI are exposed to risks of periprocedural complications and longer-term bleeding and stent thrombosis. Moreover, recent trials in stable patients without acute coronary syndromes have shown that PCI, compared with medical therapy, may provide only a modest population-average improvement in symptom relief. Given the cost and invasiveness of PCI, determining the extent to which PCI procedures are performed for appropriate and inappropriate indications could identify procedural overuse and areas for quality improvement and cost savings,” according to background information in the article. Recently, appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization were jointly developed by 6 professional organizations to support the rational and judicious use of PCI.

Paul S. Chan, M.D., M.Sc., of Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute, Kansas City, Mo., and colleagues conducted a study to quantify the proportion of PCIs classified as appropriate, of uncertain appropriateness, and as inappropriate for acute as well as nonacute indications. The study included data from patients within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry undergoing PCI between July 2009 and September 2010 at 1,091 U.S. hospitals. The appropriateness of PCI was determined using the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization. Results were stratified by whether the procedure was performed for an acute indication (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction – a certain pattern on an electrocardiogram following a heart attack; non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina with high-risk features) or nonacute indication.

Of 500,154 procedures classified, 103,245 (20.6 percent) were for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 105,708 (21.1 percent) for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 146,464 (29.3 percent) for high-risk unstable angina, and 144,737 (28.9 percent) for nonacute elective indications. Based on the appropriate use criteria definition for acute procedures, 355,417 PCIs (71.1 percent) were for acute indications and 144,737 (28.9 percent) were for nonacute indications. Heart attack comprised 58.8 percent of all acute procedures, while high-risk unstable angina comprised 41.2 percent.

The researchers found that the vast majority (98.6 percent) of acute PCIs were classified as appropriate, with 0.3 percent classified as uncertain and 1.1 percent as inappropriate. Overall, 50.4 percent of nonacute PCIs were classified as appropriate, while 38.0 percent were for uncertain indications and 11.6 percent were for inappropriate indications. In general, compared with procedures classified as appropriate and uncertain, inappropriate PCIs were more likely to occur in patients with no angina, low-risk non-invasive stress testing results or suboptimal antianginal therapy.

There was substantial hospital-level variation in the proportion of inappropriate procedures for nonacute indications. Hospitals in the lowest quartile had rates of inappropriate PCI of 6 percent or lower, while the rate of inappropriate PCI was greater than 16 percent among hospitals in the highest quartile. Analysis of the data suggested an 80 percent greater likelihood of patients with identical clinical characteristics receiving an inappropriate PCI at one randomly selected hospital as compared with another.

“Collectively, these findings suggest an important opportunity to examine and improve the selection of patients undergoing PCI in the non-acute setting,” the authors write.

“Better understanding of the clinical settings in which inappropriate PCIs occur and reduction in their variation across hospitals should be targets for quality improvement.”
(JAMA. 2011;306[1]53-61.)


  1. Stephen Algeo says

    This borders on yellow journalism but is typical of the coverage this study has received in the lay press. Does Larry Husten have a bias here? Much useful information came from this paper much of it has been ignored in favor of headlines such as “half of all elective pci’s may be inappropriate”. OK, but they also just as well might be appropriate, we just don’t know. That is what “uncertain’ means last time I checked. What we do know is that the vast majority of PCI’s are nonelective and appropriate. Contrast that to the COURAGE authors claims that “85% of coronary interventions are elective” (clearly wrong) and the recent revelation that stenting of coronary arteries is occurring at half the rate previously reported and maybe the problem is not as big as once thought.
    Rather than headling with “nearly half of non-acute PCI’s may be inappropriate”, which is pure conjecture, the better lead would have been “only 3% of PCI’s found to be inappropriate” which is a fact. I guess your bias is revealed by the spin you select.

    • I think “yellow journalism” is a bit much. Purple prose– I’ll perhaps plead guilty to that. In any case, I suppose it comes down to the way you look at it. Is the glass half full or empty? The word “may” in the headline clearly indicates that this is not a wholesale accusation. I think the study provided equal amounts good and bad news. As a reporter I think the bad “news” generally outweighs the good news in terms of what needs to be reported and addressed. In any case, to turn the question around, I can’t say I’m terribly reassured that we don’t know whether nearly half of all elective PCIs are appropriate or inappropriate. That’s a troubling thought.


  1. […] NCDR Study in JAMA: Only Half of Nonacute PCIs Deemed Appropriate […]

  2. […] NCDR Study in JAMA: Only Half of Nonacute PCIs Deemed Appropriate […]

Speak Your Mind