New data presented at EuroPCR from the much debated ORBITA trial may provide some modest temporary lessening of the pain felt by interventional cardiologists in response to the initial negative ORBITA findings. But the pain relief is likely to be only temporary, and might even be fairly compared to a placebo effect, since the major…
New ORBITA Findings May Offer Modest Symptomatic Pain Relief To Interventional Cardiologists
Cardiology World Erupts Into Controversy Over Change In Major Clinical Trial
As a major clinical trial in cardiology nears completion it has provoked a storm of criticism and controversy. The brouhaha erupted in response to a late change to one of the most important— and already controversial— trials in cardiovascular medicine. The NIH-funded ISCHEMIA trial was designed back in 2011 to provide a definitive answer to…
More Mini-Trials And Fewer Mega-Trials?
Just as dinosaurs ruled the earth for millions of years, for more than 30 years now cardiology has been ruled by mega-trials. Over the years the cardiology landscape would shake and tremble as ever more gigantic mega-trials emerged to dominate the field. Just as the giant dinosaurs paid no attention to the seemingly inconsequential little…
Will ORBITA Change Clinical Practice? The Role of Perverse Economic Incentives
Editor’s note: In this guest post Sanjay Kaul (Cedars-Sinai) explains why it is unlikely that the ORBITA trial will have a big impact on clinical practice. Guest Post: Will ORBITA Change Clinical Practice? The Role of Perverse Economic Incentives. by Sanjay Kaul, MD (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) Shortly after celebrating the 40th anniversary of PCI, first…
In Defense Of ORBITA
–The trial investigators respond to their numerous critics. If you’ve been reading about ORBITA then you probably know that the first ever placebo-controlled trial of PCI was interesting and provocative. But you’ve also probably heard that the trial was too small, too short and performed in patients who should not have been studied. Simultaneously, you…
Why was ORBITA MIA at the AHA?
By offering a last minute 2-for-1 deal shortly before its annual meeting in Anaheim the American Heart Association signalled its desperation. During the meeting, as the tumbleweed rolled down the lonely halls of the Anaheim Convention Center, the reason for the deal was apparent to everyone. The lack of crowds, the low energy, the paucity…
ORBITA Trial Puts Interventional Cardiologists On The Defensive
(Updated) Since it’s debut a week ago the ORBITA trial has provoked the most furious debate in cardiology since the COURAGE trial a decade earlier. But the ORBITA debate has proceeded far faster, fuelled by Twitter and its ability to instantaneously deliver point and counterpoint. Although ORBITA has been showered with praise for its innovative…
The Story Behind The NY Times ORBITA Anecdote
–Brahmajee Nallamothu fills in the details about the patient who didn’t get a stent because of ORBITA. Editor’s note: The New York Times story by Gina Kolata on the ORBITA trial focused on one patient who decided not to have a stent implanted when he heard about the ORBITA trial. Here is a more complete…
Diving Deep Into The ORBITA Trial
William Boden, Ajay Kirtane, and Dan Mark analyze the ORBITA trial. Editor’s note: I asked a wide variety of cardiologists for their thoughts about ORBITA, presented at the TCT meeting in Denver and published simultaneously in the Lancet. Three of them, William Boden, Ajay Kirtane, and Dan Mark, sent highly detailed comments about the trial….
Small Trial Raises Big Concerns That PCI In Stable Angina Is Just A Placebo
ORBITA trial may spark a heated debate in the cardiology community. It is only a small trial but it may have an enormous impact as it raises major questions about one of the core beliefs of clinical cardiology as it suggests that PCI for stable coronary disease has no more effect than a sham procedure….
Recent Comments