The well-known cardiovascular protective effect of education only occurs in high-income countries (HICs), according to a new report from the REACH registry appearing in Circulation. A striking finding was that highly educated women were more likely than their less educated counterparts to smoke in both affluent countries and less affluent countries. The authors point out that “studies linking socioeconomic status to cardiovascular outcomes in HICs cannot be extrapolated to LMICs (low- or middle-income countries), particularly for women.” Overall, educational attainment was protective in HICs, but not in LMICs, against obesity, smoking, and hypertension.
This post is republished with permission from CardioExchange, a new website for cardiovascular healthcare professionals from the New England Journal of Medicine.CardioBrief readers who are healthcare professionals are invited to join the site.
Here is the AHA press release:
- The incidence of heart disease, stroke and certain risk factors decreased as educational levels increased in high-income countries, but not in low-and middle-income countries.
- Among women, the most educated in low-and middle-income countries had a slight increase in the incidence of heart attack and stroke.
- Among all other groups, heart disease declined as education increased, with highly educated men in high-income countries showing the lowest level of disease.
In a way, this finding is not surprising. The effect of education is influenced by other factors.
For instance, in high income countries, even people with relatively little education have enough disposable income to both smoke and lead sedentary lives. But in lower income countries, people with less education are less likely to be able to afford to smoke… and they are more likely to walk, bicycle and have manual labor jobs.
China is a good example. Beijing used to be filled with bicycles. Now it is clogged with cars. Education and incomes rose… while urban planning, public policy and personal choices replaced clean and active bicycling with polluting and inactive driving.
These facts of daily life shape people’s behaviors more powerfully than education about how we “should” behave.
I’d be interested to see an analysis that took into account threshold levels of income that are associated with smoking… as well as the associations between income as physical activity.